of surveyed homes operated at a loss.
Up from 49% a year earlier. Nine months to March 2026.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Care Connection brings clinical, compliance, workforce and financial insight into one platform — finding where money quietly leaks across six operational domains, linking every finding to evidence, and leaving every decision with your people.
Review-only by design: no autonomous clinical, staffing, payroll or funding decisions.
Overtime, agency cover, penalty exposure and payroll variance, compared with a feasible compliant option.
Falls, pressure injury, medication and deterioration signals against recognised clinical standards.
What was detected, from what data, who reviewed it, and what was decided — for every finding.
Most residential providers are running at a loss, and labour is where the gap lands. The systems that hold the answers — clinical, rostering, payroll, finance — each see only their part.
Up from 49% a year earlier. Nine months to March 2026.
StewartBrown · March 2026 ↗Down from a $0.91 surplus a year earlier. Nine months to March 2026.
Inside Ageing · July 2026 ↗Nine months to March 2026 versus the prior year.
The Weekly Source · July 2026 ↗Survey benchmarks, not a recoverable leakage rate. Whole-home losses include accommodation and everyday living; wage and care-delivery changes also affect costs.
Each one sits between systems that individually work as designed. Care Connection reconciles across them — and the same three-step loop applies to every domain: find it, validate it, reduce the repeat cost.
Avoidable overtime, agency cover, penalty exposure, broken shifts, casual loading where permanent capacity exists, skill-mix inefficiency.
What did this roster cost against a feasible, compliant alternative for the same care?
Partner trial openMisapplied classifications, overtime and penalty configuration, sleepover and travel rules, manual overrides that drift — exposure runs both ways.
Given what was actually worked and the rules, what should have been paid?
On the roadmapResidents whose documented care complexity has moved since assessment, without a funding review being triggered. Flagged for clinician review — never reclassified automatically.
Which residents show a sustained change that warrants a funding review?
On the roadmapAvoidable vacant-bed days from slow referrals, missing documentation, delayed agreements and room turnaround.
How much revenue did avoidable vacancy cost, and where did the process stall?
On the roadmapServices delivered but not claimed, wrong codes or units, rejected claims, under-used budgets, negative-margin visits.
Did every valid service become the right claim, payment and margin?
On the roadmapDuplicate invoices, contract price drift, off-contract purchasing, site-to-site price variance, unmanaged increases.
Are we paying what we agreed, and buying consistently?
On the roadmapNot sure where to start? Most providers begin with workforce and rostering — the largest cost pool and the fastest to evidence. A short conversation will tell you which domain is worth a first look.
Talk to usClinical, risk, compliance, workforce, analytics and family communication — drawing on the same operational data, so a signal in one is understood in the context of the others.
Documentation, care planning, assessments and resident tracking, with care requirements central to every downstream view.
Real-time risk indicators and pattern analysis across clinical and operational data, flagged for human review with evidence attached.
Regulatory mapping, incident management, audit-ready dashboards and a traceable record of every finding and decision.
Roster options tested against employment rules, qualifications, availability and staffing requirements — before the shift, not after the pay run.
Executive dashboards, trend analysis and financial indicators that connect care, workforce and money in one view.
A communication hub with care-plan visibility and activity updates, so families see what's happening and why.
The same loop runs in every domain. Here it is for workforce and rostering, the first domain in the partner trial.
Compare rosters, timesheets, payroll, agency invoices and availability. Look for avoidable overtime, agency cover, penalty exposure and overlooked internal capacity.
Compare fully costed options against agreed employment rules, qualifications, availability and care requirements. Link each finding to its evidence and flag uncertainty.
Review findings with workforce and finance stakeholders, agree an owner and action, then track recurrence and validated savings against an agreed baseline.
Every finding and every proposed roster goes to a person for review. The target is cost that added no care value — the wrong worker at the wrong rate for a shift that still had to be filled — never the care itself.
The integration pattern behind Care Connection isn't theoretical. A review-only AI risk panel already runs against resident profiles across four clinical domains, each measured against a recognised standard.
The same architecture extends to workforce and financial data. That is what the partner trial validates.
Single homes to multi-site groups working to AN-ACC funding and care-minute requirements.
Support at Home providers reconciling plans, delivery, claims and workforce cost.
Operators adding care services who need compliance and workforce visibility from day one.
Governance, compliance and operational advisers who want an evidence-linked platform behind their advice.
A short scoping conversation, no obligation. We'll tell you honestly whether Care Connection fits, which domain is worth a first look, and what a trial would involve.
We reply within two business days.
We reply within two business days. If it's the workforce trial you're after, you can also register directly at trial.careconnection.health.
Start with an agreed service or roster period using real or synthetic data. Review an evidence-linked set of potential savings, compare AI-assisted roster options and test disruption scenarios such as sick calls. Your feedback shapes the launch.